2010 CPT Category II & III Codes You Might Miss

Some codes won't make it here. Photo: Wikipedia.

Yes, our CPT books are fountains of knowledge, but there are a few official 2010 CPT codes that won’t appear in a printed book until 2011. Luckily, the AMA has a couple web sites that give us the 411.

Category II codes that take effect January 1, 2010 are listed here. According to CPT, Cat II codes don’t have RVUs, and are used primarily for performance tracking.

2010 Category II codes that won’t appear in print until 2011 include those involving DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorders, initial and subsequent evaluation for HEP C, various epilepsy evals, pulmonary function testing, neuraxial anesthesia and more. You’ll see these codes marked in green in the list you get when you click the above link.

Category III codes that take effect January 1, 2010 are listed here. According to CPT, Cat III codes are for “emerging technology, services and procedures” and when available for what you want to describe, you should use them instead of Cat I unlisted codes. One coding expert I know explained Cat III as “tryouts” for becoming a Cat I CPT code.

2010 Category III codes that won’t appear in print until 2011 include certain codes for audiometry, paravertebral facet joint injection, intrafacet implants and more. If you click on the link above, you’ll see print publication dates in the far right column.

Online coding references never have to say ’stop the presses.’ Try Supercoder and get real-time code and CCI edit updates. Sign up for your 30-day free trial here.

Related articles:

  1. 141 New ICD-9 Codes Debut for 2010 Like a passel of fresh-faced debutantes, the new ICD-9…
  2. Psssst. Get the Inside Scoop on Proposed ICD-9 Codes for 2010And you thought this week was going to be run-of-the-mill….
  3. E/M Codes Top the List of CERT Mistakes, CMS SaysWith almost $600 million reported improperly, physicians didn’t document their…

Share:

More Posts

ICD-10 Data: Does It Matter?

It is often argued that ICD-10 coding does nothing for the patient. Recently that point was made at the U.S. House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Health hearing “Examining ICD-10 Implementation” last week.

Read More »