52214 Coding Challenge: Fulguration, Then TUIBNC

Question: If my physician went to do a TUIBNC and found bleeding of prostatic varices, fulgurated them, then did the TUIBNC, can I charge the 52214 for the fulguration of the prostatic varices?

Answer: Yes. You can report both the transurethral incision of the bladder neck contracture (TUIBNC) and the fulguration of the bleeding varices your urologist discovered.

First, report 52450 (Transurethral incision of prostate) for the TUIBN. Append modifier 52 (Reduced services) to show that the incision was only at the bladder neck and not the complete prostatic urethra, bladder neck to the verumontanum.

Then, you can also report 52214 (Cystourethroscopy, with fulguration [including cryosurgery or laser surgery] of trigone, bladder neck, prostatic fossa, urethra, or periurethral glands) for the fulguration. Append modifier 51 (Multiple procedures) to indicate that your urologist performed more than one procedure during the operative session.

Skip 51 sometimes: Many payers, including Medicare, no longer require modifier 51. Processing claims electronically allows the payer to recognize when your physician performs multiple procedures and automatically make the necessary reduction in payment. Use ICD-9 diagnosis code 596.0 (Bladder neck obstruction) for the bladder neck contraction and 456.8 (Varicose veins of other sites; varices of other sites) for the prostatic varices.

Get urinary catheter coding training from urology coding guru Dr. Michael Ferragamo.

Related articles:

  1. Is this Biopsy Mistake Costing Your Urology Practice $400 Per Claim? Tip: Look beyond the term ‘fulguration’ when you choose…
  2. Bundle of His Recording Coding ChallengeQuestion: How should I report right atrial pacing and recording…
  3. Spinal Surgery Coding Challenge: Is Hemilaminectomy Bundled With Fusion?Question: Our orthopedic surgeon turned in a note that says,…

Share:

More Posts

ICD-10 Data: Does It Matter?

It is often argued that ICD-10 coding does nothing for the patient. Recently that point was made at the U.S. House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Health hearing “Examining ICD-10 Implementation” last week.

Read More »