Ophthalmology Coding Challenge: Flashers & Floaters

January 24, 2010

How’s Your EO Coding & Billing? Test Yourself With This Scenario.

Question: A patient reports flashes and floaters but the ophthalmologist does not find evidence of retinal pathology on routine ophthalmoscopy. Are we justified in billing for extended ophthalmoscopy (EO)?

Answer: If the ophthalmoscopy is a routine part of a patient’s eye exam, do not bill for it separately. However, complaints of flashers and floaters are always serious and must be evaluated carefully; often, these symptoms will justify extended ophthalmoscopy (92225, Ophthalmoscopy, extended, with retinal drawing [e.g., for retinal detachment, melanoma], with interpretation and report; initial).

Use 92225 to report a Goldmann-3 exam (examining the retina with a three-mirror goniolens). Remember to keep your interpretation and report of the findings in the patient’s medical record. In many cases in which flashers and floaters are present, extended ophthalmoscopy (EO) combined with a retinal exam shows vitreous degeneration or posterior vitreous detachment (379.21, Vitreous degeneration). If an ophthalmologist does not see anything in the routine ophthalmoscopy, he will probably not do an EO.

In the unlikely event that the ophthalmologist doesn’t find any significant problems with the retina after the EO, link 92225 to 379.24 (Disorders of vitreous body; other vitreous opacities). “Vitreous floaters” appears in a note under that code in the ICD-9 manual. If the ophthalmologist does not see floaters, look to the 368.1x series (Subjective visual disturbances).

However: If the ophthalmologist can’t see anything more with an EO than he can see with a routine ophthalmoscopy, defending the use of the EO may be difficult. Some experts recommend not billing for an EO unless there is some abnormality of the retina or vitreous to draw in the report.

© Ophthalmology Coding Alert. Download your 2 FREE sample issues here.

Do you know all you need to know to code your ophthalmology claims in 2010? Quick checklist says for sure.

Related articles:

Ophthalmology Coding: RT/LT or Modifier 50? Prevent Uni-Bi Reporting Errors With This Expert Insight Don’t…
Ophthalmology Coding: GDX, VF, & Temp Plugs — How Many Modifiers?Question: A patient came in for a GDX and visual…
Eye Surgery Coding Challenge: Denials for 15823 & 67904Question: I started receiving denials for 15823 and 67904. To…

Share:

More Posts

Last-Minute Tips For Creating An ICD-10 Command Center

When the clock ticks in a new month and the entire healthcare industry is thereby mandated to begin using the new ICD-10 code set, there

ICD-10 Data: Does It Matter?

It is often argued that ICD-10 coding does nothing for the patient. Recently that point was made at the U.S. House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Health hearing “Examining ICD-10 Implementation” last week.

Researchers Create Online Tool To Ease Transition to ICD-10 Codes

Researchers have developed an online mapping tool designed to help stakeholders transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 code sets, EHR Intelligence reports.

Know your Priorities When it Comes to ICD-10: Five Areas that Deserve your Attention Now

The next nine months are critical in terms of preparing for a smooth transition to ICD-10. If ICD-10 isn’t a priority in your organization yet, it should quickly rise to the top of the list as soon as possible.

There’s not enough incentive to keep health care data safe

The grim message following a breach that has endangered sensitive data belonging to 80 million current and former Anthem health insurance customers is that we can only expect more health care data breaches in the future.