CMS announcement is triumph for physicians who haven’t collected in the past.
If you’ve been writing off tobacco cessation counseling as non-payable, it’s time to change your tune.
In the past, CMS only covered 99406-99407 (Smoking and tobacco us…
AMA corrects vestibular test codes to allow partial reporting.
The Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) came down hard on practitioners who perform vestibular testing earlier this year, but a new correction, effective Oct. 1, should ease the restrictions and help the otolaryngology, neurology, and audiology practices that report these services.
The problem: CCI edits currently restrict practices from reporting 92541, 92542, 92544, and 92545 individually if three or less of the tests are performed, notes Debbie Abel, Au.D., director of reimbursement and practice compliance with the American Academy of Audiology.
The solution: Starting October 1, 2010, “if two or three of these codes are reported for the same date of service by the same provider for the same beneficiary, an NCCI-associated modifier may be utilized to bypass the NCCI edits,” CMS wrote in a decision to alter the edits.
The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) has requested “clarification regarding the correct NCCI-modifier to use when reporting the codes to Medicare,” noted Lemmietta G. McNeilly, PhD, CCC-SLP, CAE, chief staff officer of Speech-Language Pathology with ASHA, in a July 29 announcement.
Look for Changes to Vestibular Testing Descriptors
The root of the CCI problem began when the 2010 CPT manual was published, including new code 92540 (Basic vestibular evaluation …) and the subsequent codes following it, which make up the individual components of 92540. “The clarification that resulted in the NCCI edits being lifted should be included in upcoming versions of the manual,” Abel tells Part B Insider.
According to the AMA’s Errata page, code descriptors should read as follows, effective Oct. 1:
…
CMS says keep patient medical records for 6 years.
Medical practices often hear conflicting advice regarding how long they must hang on to a patient’s medical records, but CMS intends to clear up any misinformation with new MLN Matters article SE1022…
Don’t assume separate coding for J0670, anymore.
The latest Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits contain plenty of anesthesia and pain management pairs you should check — and straight away. They went into effect July 1. CCI 16.2 encompasses 16,843 new edit pairs, according to analyst Frank Cohen, MPA, of MIT Solutions, Inc., in Clearwater, Fla. With 11 percent of all active edits affecting anesthesia procedures, you can’t afford to miss any of the changes.
Other Work Includes Paravertebral Facet Injection
Although the current CPT book doesn’t include them, you could begin using several new codes for paravertebral facet joint injections in January 2010. Now CCI edits bundle two of the new codes with every anesthesia code (00100-01999) and many nerve destruction procedures. The paravertebral injection codes affected are:
Procedures paired with 0213T and 0216T range from 64600 (Destruction by neurolytic agent, trigeminal nerve; supraorbital, infraorbital, mental, or inferior alveolar branch) and 64622 (Destruction by neurolytic agent, paravertebral facet joint nerve; lumbar or sacral, single level) to 64650 (Chemodenervation of eccrine glands; both axillae). Most of the edit pairs carry a “0” modifier indicator, but CCI lists a few with modifier indicator “1.” Check the full CCI file to verify whether you can use a modifier to break specific edits.
ME Edits Also Hit 0213T-0218T
Paravertebral facet joint injection codes 0213T-0218T come into play as part of mutually exclusive (ME) edits, as well.
CCI 16.2 pairs each choice with corresponding codes involving fluoroscopy or CT guidance: 64490-64492 (Injection[s], diagnostic or…
Look for a physician order for diagnostic audiology tests.
If you thought CMS’s May transmittal on coding for audiology services was the last word on the subject, think again. On July 23, the agency rescinded the May directive and issued new guidance…
CMS adds Obama recs into next year’s fee schedule.
The President signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) into law on March 23, but many practices haven’t yet noticed significant impacts from the legislation. In 2011, however, you could see huge boosts from it, because CMS has proposed incorporating many of the law’s features into next year’s Physician Fee Schedule.
On June 25, CMS released its proposed Physician Fee Schedule for 2011. The 1,250-page document, which will be published in the July 13 Federal Register, offers several advantages to medical practices, including bonuses for primary care physicians. “Improving access to preventive services and primary care is a top priority for HHS,” said HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in a June 25 statement. “The proposed rule is just one part of a broader effort we are making to improve the health status of Medicare beneficiaries.”
According to the proposal, primary care practitioners will benefit from a 10 percent bonus starting on January 1, as prescribed in the PPACA.
Practitioners who qualify will be doctors, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, or physician assistants with the primary specialty designation of family medicine, internal medicine, geriatric medicine, or pediatrics.
To qualify for the 10 percent bonus, the law stipulates that the primary care practitioners will have to bill at least 60 percent of their allowed charges as ‘primary care services,’ which are defined by E/M codes 99201-99215, nursing facility or rest home care codes 99304-99340, or home services codes 99341-99350.
“The rule we are proposing today is just one part of the Administration’s efforts to improve the health status of Medicare beneficiaries by expanding access to preventive services, and promoting early detection and prompt treatment of medical conditions,” said Jonathan Blum, deputy administrator and director of CMS’s Center for Medicare, in a…
MACs won’t process June claims until today, in hopes that Congress will act.
The Senate’s delays could mean serious payment crunches for your practice.
Last month, the freeze that has been keeping the Medicare conversion factor at 2009 levels expired, meaning that Part B practices were due to face a 21-percent cut effective for dates of service June 1 and thereafter. Because Congress had not yet intervened to stop those cuts, CMS initially instructed MACs to hold claims for the first 10 business days of June while lawmakers could deliberate whether to eliminate the looming cuts.
When the Senate reconvened on June 7, many analysts expected its members to vote on H.R. 4213, “The American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act of 2010,” which was expected to increase your payments through the end of this year, according to the text listed on the House Ways and Means Committee Web site. However, the bill has not passed, leading CMS to extend the MACs’ claims hold through June 17.
According to a June 14 CMS notification, the agency directed its contractors “to continue holding June 1 and later claims through Thursday, June 17, lifting the hold on Friday, June 18.”
CMS acknowledged in its June 14 notification that the lengthened claims hold period “may present cash flow problems for some Medicare providers. However, we expect that the delay, if any, beyond the normal processing period will be only a few days.”
The impact of the 17-day claims hold will vary, depending on the practice and how many Medicare patients it sees, says Quinten A. Buechner, MS, MDiv, CPC, ACSFP/GI/PEDS, PCS, CCP, CMSCS, president of ProActive Consultants in Cumberland, Wis.
Those practices with large Medicare populations could face a cash flow crisis, says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CENTC, CPC-H, CPC-P, CPC-I,…
If the doctor does not circle a diagnosis, it may be up to you to find one.
Don’t let an incomplete superbill damage your chances of submitting an accurate claim. If the doctor in your office fails to indicate the ICD-9 code for the condition that he treated, you should read through his documentation to find which diagnoses you should report.
Open the Notes When You Have to — and Even When You Don’t
Suppose your physician hands you a superbill with the procedures circled and the diagnosis left blank.
You could ask the physician which diagnosis to report, or you could examine the documentation yourself. If your office has a policy that includes “coding by abstraction” by certified/qualified coders, then submitting charges based on what is supported (documented) in the note is appropriate, says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CPCH,CPC-P, CENTC, CHCC, with CRN Healthcare Solutions in Tinton Falls, N.J. The physician should be signing off on these charges as part of your internal policy.
Some practices choose to review the documentation and compare it against any diagnoses recorded on the superbill, even when they aren’t required to. This ensures that the documentation matches the code selection every time.
When in Doubt, Confirm With the Physician
If you are new at coding diagnoses from the physician’s notes, you should doublecheck your code selections with the practitioners before submitting your claims.
“Until a coder feels comfortable with the ICD-9 books and the codes used more often in their office, it’s a good idea to run the choices by a clinician,” says Suzan Berman, CPC, CEMC, CEDC, senior manager of coding and compliance with the Physician Services Division of UPMC in Pittsburgh. “You never want to give a patient a disease or symptom they don’t have ” or one more…
If patient’s critical care and visit satisfies time regs, 99291 is the better bet.
When scouring the notes for evidence of an emergency department caveat scenario, coders can easily forget to ask themselves one simple question: Can I report a critical care code for this scenario?
The answer’s yes more often than you might think, says Caral Edelberg, CPC, CPMA, CCS-P, CHC, president of Edelberg Compliance Associates in Baton Rouge, La.
“Many patients who qualify for the caveat may also be candidates for critical care. If the condition is severe enough that the patient’s ability to provide this information is impaired, then the condition may be critical,” she explains.
Critical Care Omits Specific History Component
Considering critical care and the caveat simultaneously can make your head spin, as the ED caveat does not even apply to 99291 (Critical care, evaluation and management of the critical ill or critically injured patient; first 30-74 minutes) or +99292 (… each additional 30 minutes [List separately in addition to code for primary service]).
Why? “There are not the same bullet-counting requirements for documentation of history, physical examination, or MDM [medical decision making] for critical care,” explains Edelberg. The descriptors for critical care concern only E/M of the critically ill or injured patient.
So when your physician invokes the emergency department caveat for a patient, check to see if the patient was critically ill or injured; if she was, and the physician documents at least 30 minutes of critical care, consider 99291.
Payout: The only level of service you can invoke the emergency department caveat on is 99285 (Emergency department visit for the evaluation and management of a patient, which requires these 3 key components within the constraints imposed by the urgency of the patient’s clinical condition and/or mental status: a comprehensive history; a…
From head to toe, the new diagnosis codes hold something for everyone.
Whether your patients present with cardiologic, orthopedic, or gynecologic complaints, the next round of ICD-9 codes could hold important changes for you. Here’s the rundown on the new codes most relevant to radiologists — including a new option for retained magnetic metal fragments.
Remember: ICD-9 2011 will go into effect Oct. 1, 2010. The official version will be released in the fall, so the codes below are not yet final.
1. Look Forward to More Specific Ectasia Codes
The proposed changes to ICD-9 2011 add four codes specific to aortic ectasia. These codes are among the most significant changes for radiology coders because you may see that term in your radiologist’s findings, says Helen L. Avery, CPC, CHC, CPC-I, manager of revenue cycle services for Los Angeles-based Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting Inc. “Ectasia” means dilation or enlargement, and aortic ectasia typically refers to enlargement that is milder than an aneurysm. But ICD-9 2010 does not distinguish ectasia from aneurysm, indexing aortic ectasia to 441.9 (Aortic aneurysm of unspecified site without mention of rupture) and 441.5 (Aortic aneurysm of unspecified site, ruptured).
The proposed 2011 codes are specific to aortic ectasia and differ based on anatomic site:
2. Watch for ‘Claudication’ in Stenosis Report
Another one of the important changes is the proposed addition of 724.03 (Spinal stenosis, lumbar region, with neurogenic claudication), says Avery. The code refers to lumbar spinal stenosis, which is a narrowing of the spinal canal, according to the Sept. 16-17, 2009, ICD-9-CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting proposal (available here). Neurogenic claudication “is a commonly used term for a…