Diabetes Coding Blunders That Cause Denials

Do you know the 5 fourth digits for 250.xx you should avoid?

A diabetes diagnosis code shows up on millions of dollars worth of claims each year, and that number is climbing rapidly. Make sure you code correctly to get every penny your practice deserves for managing the disease and treating manifestations and related conditions.

Diabetes is an underlying systemic disease, so you should code for it when it’s documented that your patient has the condition, even if you don’t have an active intervention planned, said Jill Young, CPC, CPC-ED, CPC-IM, with Young Medical Consulting in Lansing, Mich. during the Coding Institute-sponsored audioconference Diabetes: What do YOU need to know about 249.xx and 250.xx?

Don’t miss this audio training event. Hospitalist documentation and coding tactics that get you paid. With Linda Martien.

Base your selection on the physician’s documentation of these items, says Young:

Type I versus Type II;

Manifestations of the disease;

Whether the current treatment regimen keeps the glucose levels within acceptable levels (controlled versus uncontrolled); and

Whether the patient is insulin-dependent.

Check your circulation: The fourth digit “7” indicates diabetes with peripheral circulatory disorders. Some coders see this code descriptor and think they can pair it with manifestations of coronary artery disease or cerebrovascular accident, says Trish Twombly, RN, BSN, HCS-D, CHCE, director of coding with Foundation Management Services in Denton, Texas. But the word “peripheral” is the key in this code description.

Peripheral circulatory disorders include peripheral vascular disease, angiopathy, and gangrene, not cardiac circulatory conditions, Twombly says.

Aim high: While the ICD-9 code set includes 10 options for a fourth digit when coding for diabetes, there are three digits on the low end of the list that you’re unlikely to list for a patient who isn’t hospitalized. These are:

250.1x (Diabetes with ketoacidosis);

250.2x (Diabetes with hyperosmolarity); and

250.3x (Diabetes with other coma).

Typically, these codes indicate that a patient’s diabetes is so out of control that they are in a coma.

Kick This Old Habit

Veteran coders will remember the days when the only way to indicate a complication of diabetes was to list 250.9x. But when the ICD-9 code set was expanded to include the 10 fourth digits for 250.xx, “9” came to mean diabetes with an unspecified complication. This tells the carrier that you don’t know what your patient’s complications are, Twombly says.

Listing “9” in the fourth digit slot for 250.xx may be appropriate in situations when labs aren’t back, but much of the time, the complications should be well-documented.

Take a second look: You might automatically look to fourth digit “5” for 250.xx if your diabetic patient has cataracts. However, diabetic or snowflake cataracts are rare in Type II diabetes and your Type II diabetic most likely has senile cataracts which aren’t considered manifestations of diabetes. One symptom of diabetes is burning, tingling, or numbness of the hands and feet or neuropathy. You would look to 250.6x (Diabetes with neurological manifestations) if your patient had this neurological condition.

When you look in your code book under 250.6x you’ll see 337.1 (Peripheral autonomic neuropathy in disorders classified elsewhere), but this isn’t the code you need for a patient with diabetic polyneuropathy, Twombly says. Code 337.1 indicates neuropathy of the heart, gut, and brainstem — that’s what “autonomic” indicates she explains.

To code correctly for diabetic neuropathy, list 357.2 (Polyneuropathy in diabetes).

© Home Health ICD-9 Alert.

Related articles:

  1. Charcot Foot Coding: When To Boot 250.00 Boot 250.00 for Charcot Foot, Embrace Dual Dxs Stop…
  2. Flow Chart: Tame the Diabetes Diagnosis Coding Beast When coding for diabetes (250.xx), the fourth and fifth…
  3. Anatomy for Coders: Diabetes Digest (249.00-250.93)Almost every coder deals with diabetes, so here’s a quick…

Share:

More Posts

ICD-10 Data: Does It Matter?

It is often argued that ICD-10 coding does nothing for the patient. Recently that point was made at the U.S. House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Health hearing “Examining ICD-10 Implementation” last week.

Read More »