Eye Surgery Coding Challenge: Denials for 15823 & 67904

Question: I started receiving denials for 15823 and 67904. To report this combo, should I use a modifier?

Answer: If the ophthalmologist performs the blepharoplasty (bleph) with excessive weight (15823, Blepharoplasty, upper eyelid; with excessive skin weighting down lid) on one eye and the blepharoptosis (ptosis) repair (67904, Repair of blepharoptosis; [tarso] levator resection or advancement, external approach) on the other eye, you may be able to report both codes by using modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) on 15823 to designate a separate site from 67904. Otherwise, you should report only 67904.

The Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) Version 15.1, effective April 1, 2009, made 15823 and 67904 mutually exclusive, meaning Medicare believes that the two procedures would not typically be performed at the same operative session. In other words, an ophthalmologist would either perform blepharoptosis repair or blepharoplasty, not both.

The pair has a modifier indicator of 1. So, as  described above, if the ophthalmologist performs 15823 and 67904 on different sites, you may override the bundle with modifier 59.CCI 15.1 lists 15823 as the column 2 code. Therefore, you would append modifier 59 to 15823, if appropriate. Documentation must support why the two services were unbundled.

© Ophthalmology Coding Alert. Download 2 FREE sample issues here.

2010 Opthalmology & Optometry Coding & Fee Schedule Audio Update. Get your whole practice up to speed for one low price.

Related articles:

  1. Spinal Surgery Coding Challenge: Is Hemilaminectomy Bundled With Fusion?Question: Our orthopedic surgeon turned in a note that says,…
  2. Avoid This Blepharoplasty Coding Blunder  Don’t settle for denials for a functional surgery that…
  3. Spinal Surgery Coding Challenge: Tethered Cord Release & Dural Tag RemovalQuestion: My neurosurgeon released a tethered cord under the microscope,…

Share:

More Posts

ICD-10 Data: Does It Matter?

It is often argued that ICD-10 coding does nothing for the patient. Recently that point was made at the U.S. House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Health hearing “Examining ICD-10 Implementation” last week.

Read More »