Ob-gyn Coding Challenge: Deliver Postpartum V Codes With Care

Bonus: Get exposure to ICD-10 coding equivalents.

Question: A mentally-challenged patient who delivered at home was admitted to the hospital for postpartum care. The patient delivered the placenta at home, and once admitted, she had no complications, but the ob-gyn did perform a first degree laceration repair. I’m not sure what diagnosis code to report. Should I look at routine postpartum care or pregnancy complications? And if I use a complication code, what would the fifth digit to a “1″ or “0?”

Texas Subscriber

Answer: Under most situations where the ob-gyn treated no problems during the admission, you would code V24.0 (Postpartum care and examination; immediately after delivery) on the admission date and V24.2 (Routine postpartum follow-up) for any subsequent routine care.

But in this case, your physician also repaired a first degree laceration (CPT code 59300, Episiotomy or vaginal repair, by other than attending physician). Therefore, you may consider this to be an admission for a postpartum condition and instead report 664.04 (First degree perineal laceration). The fifth digit cannot be “1″ or “0″ because the patient delivered prior to her admission and of course you know her delivery status. In this case, the fifth digit must be “4″ to indicate a purely postpartum condition. You may optionally report V24.0 and V24.2 as your secondary diagnoses, but they are not required in this case.

ICD-10: In the near future, you will replace ICD-9 codes V24.0 and V24.2 with ICD-10 codes Z39.0 (Encounter for care and examination of mother immediately after delivery) and Z39.2 (Encounter for routine postpartum follow-up), respectively. Code 664.04 will be replaced by O70.0 (First degree perineal laceration during delivery).

Ob-gyn Coding Alert

Be a hero. Join the coding community at Supercoder Fan Page.

Share:

More Posts

ICD-10 Data: Does It Matter?

It is often argued that ICD-10 coding does nothing for the patient. Recently that point was made at the U.S. House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Health hearing “Examining ICD-10 Implementation” last week.

Read More »