Place-of-Service Codes Caused $13 Million in Overpayments

Double check POS 11 shouldn’t be 22 — or 24.

Entering your place-of-service (POS) number on your claim form may seem routine, but a recent OIG audit found that practices are not giving POS numbers the care they deserve.

Based on a review of 100 non-facility Part B claims from 2007, the OIG found that only 10 of the sampled claims had the correct POS code assigned to it, resulting in overpayments of over $4,700. Based on the sample, the OIG estimated that Medicare nationally overpaid physicians $13.8 million in POS coding errors, according to the report.

Physicians collect higher payments for services rendered in the physician’s office, a patient’s home, an ASC, a nursing facility, or another non-hospital facility versus those services performed in a facility setting (such as a hospital). The OIG review of 100 sample claims found that 90 of the services were coded as having been performed in a non-facility location, even though “60 were actually performed in hospital outpatient departments and 30 were ASC-approved procedures performed in ASCs,” the report notes.

As a result of the audit findings, CMS indicated that it would institute safeguards to ensure that POS errors are better identified. Therefore, practices should remember to focus just as clearly on POS coding as they do on procedure and diagnosis coding to avoid scrutiny and accusations of miscoding.

Written by Torrey Kim, MA, CPC, editor for Part B Insider: Keeps you up to date, compliant.

Share:

More Posts

ICD-10 Data: Does It Matter?

It is often argued that ICD-10 coding does nothing for the patient. Recently that point was made at the U.S. House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Health hearing “Examining ICD-10 Implementation” last week.

Read More »